Instead of just judging based on a person's appearance, Katherine believes that _________.

相似题目

• 在Oracle中，INSTEAD OF触发器主要用于（）。

  A、表 B、表和视图 C、基于单个表的视图 D、基于多个表的视图

  查看最佳答案

• My I have two（）instead of beans, please?

  A . corn's ear B . corn ears C . ear of corns D . ears of cor

  查看最佳答案

• Assumption of superiority may lead to assuming similarity instead of difference.

  查看最佳答案

• In the desert, water is always very important. Instead of lawns, like green grass, people will just have, like a cactus or other dry area plant life there._________

  查看最佳答案

• Evidence-based HR provides managers with data to make decisions, instead of just relying on intuition.

  查看最佳答案

• The judges' wigs were made of pighair.

  查看最佳答案

• To use military action instead of invasion, what figure of speech is used?

  查看最佳答案

• We should do something ____________ just talking about it.(broad-minded; self-satisfied; instead of; accused of )

  查看最佳答案

• What is the judge's wig made of?

  查看最佳答案

• 4.The Supreme Court ruled the judge's order That ruling was considered a major for freedom of the press.

  查看最佳答案

• Miss World organizers claim on their official website that ____ are judged on qualities other than just their physical appearance. (选词填空： contestants; attestants)

  查看最佳答案

• In ( ) of criminal investigation, a judge might also be an examining magistrate.

  查看最佳答案

• If you are in a speaking competition, you can just look at judges who smile at you.

  查看最佳答案

• Instead of being a typist, Jenny dreamed of becoming a pilot.

  A．Right B．Wrong C．Not mentioned

  查看最佳答案

• What is the basic tone of the writer judging from the article？

  A．Critical B．Negative C．Positive D．Objective

  查看最佳答案

• The phrase "litmus test" is in bad odor for good reason: politicians should be judged on a variety of positions, not just one. But deep down, nearly every voter has at least one litmus test— an issue so personally important that a politician who fails the test is forever tainted, or at least excluded from consideration for the presidency.

  I inherited my one litmus test from my father, Jim Alter, who flew 33 harrowing missions over Nazi Germany during World War 11. My father is not just a veteran who by all odds should not have survived. He is a true patriot. His litmus test is the proposal to amend the Constitution to ban flag burning, which will come up for a vote next week in the U. S. Senate. For dad—and me—any member of Congress who supports amending the Bill of Rights for the first time in the history of this country for a nonproblem like flag burning is showing serious disrespect for our Constitution and for the values for which brave Americans gave their lives. Such disrespect is a much more serious threat than the random idiots who once every decade or so try (often unsuccessfully) to burn a flag. Our understandable outrage at flag burning shouldn't turn our brains to mush. "I feel the same sense of outrage, but I would not amend that great shield of democracy (the Constitution) to hammer a few miscreants," Colin Powell said when the issue last came up (his position has not changed). "The flag will be flying proudly long after they have slunk away." Powell argues that a constitutional ban on flag burning is a sign of weakness and fear. John Glenn, another of the thousands of combat veterans against the amendment (they have banded together in a group called Veterans Defending the Bill of Rights), notes that "those 10 amendments we call the Bill of Rights have never been changed or altered by one iota, not by one word, not a single time in all of American history. There was not a single change during any of our foreign wars, and not during recessions or depressions or panics. Not a single change when we were going through times of great emotion and anger like the Vietnam era, when flag after flag was burned or desecrated. There is only one way to weaken our nation. The way to weaken our nation would be to erode the freedom that we all share." Actually, even during the Vietnam War, flag burning was rare. By one count, there have been only 45 such incidents in 200 years, and fewer than half a dozen since it was outlawed in 1989. Should the Constitution be amended, however, the incidence of flag burning is expected to surge as a form. of civil disobedience. What began as a phony issue designed to prove patriotism (usually on the part of those who never served, the primary sponsors) could become a real concern. The flag-burning amendment, which already passed the House, is apparently just short of the 67 needed in the Senate. With one or two absences, the amendment would be approved. It would then go to the states for ratification, where its chances for approval appear good. Senators afraid of being seen as soft on flag burners should just adopt the Hillary Clinton dodge: support for a statute, but not an amendment. Another law is a dopey idea (an earlier one was struck down by the Supreme Court), but it's politically safe and better than perverting the Constitution. To make matters worse, the amendment is vaguely worded, which led to fatuous debate in the Senate over whether a woman wearing a skimpy bathing suit patterned with stars and stripes was guilty of desecration. Bloggers wondered the same thing about President Bush's new habit of autographing flags when he shakes hands on rope lines. Unconstitutional？ With a war on and a hundred other pressing problems, it's nice to see our elected representatives focused on what really counts. The usual litmus tests-abortion, gun control, Iraq-shouldn't be. Reasonable and sincere people can disagree, w A．The effectiveness of litmus test is greatly undermined by its failure to judge politicians on a variety of positions. B．It's unfair to exclude a politician who fails a certain litmus test from the presidency. C．Current litmus tests like abortion or gun control are not reliable indicators of public opinions. D．Some specific litmus tests on certain issues axe fundamental in shaping people' s judgment of politicians.

  查看最佳答案

• Judging by the $23 billion it earned last year, these should be the best of times for Shell, the Anglo-Dutch energy giant that ranks third among the top five Western oil companies. But Wall Street isn't celebrating. Instead, analysts are worried that buried beneath the record profit figures are worrying signs of a business in decline.

  That's because Shell hasn't been able to find nearly as much oil and gas as it's now pumping out of the ground. In fact, it hasn't even come close—replacing only 60% to 70% of what it produced in 2005 and only 19% in 2004. Shell has had reserve problems for years—a controversy over improperly booked assets forced it to reduce estimated reserves by roughly 30% and led to the resignation of its CEO, Phil Watts, in 2004. But what's troubling now is that Shell is falling way behind rivals like Exxon and BP despite spending billions more each year on exploring and drilling new wells. Last year Exxon replaced 112% of production; BP came up with 95%. "I have never seen anything like this," says Fadel Gheit, a veteran energy analyst with Oppenheimer & Co. "Shell used to represent the gold standard in this industry, but lately they can't get their act together." To be sure, Shell still has huge assets—nearly 12 billion barrels. But in the oil and gas industry, reserve replacement is the best guide to whether a company will be able to maintain-or grow-production in the future. So not replacing what you pump, says longtime industry observer Matthew Simmons, "is like eating your seed corn. If you're not finding new oil, you're just liquidating what you've got." Indeed, Shell's daily production figures have been weak lately, falling 6.7 % in 2005, to 3.52 million barrels a day. Privately, Shell execs say the company's decision to cut spending for exploration when oil prices bottomed out in the late 1990s is partly to blame for the anemic numbers now. Shell CEO Jeroen Vander Veer insists that projects like those on Sakhalin Island off Siberia and in Nigeria and the Gulf of Mexico will enable the company to start catching up with peers in the years ahead. It won't be easy. "If you're not adding to reserves, you have a problem," says Sanford Bernstein analyst Oswald Clint. "Shell will have to run twice as hard just to stay in place." According to the passage, the decline of Shell A．is a hidden process. B．is caused by the profit last year. C．is the estimation of Wall Street. D．is the fault of the CEO.

  查看最佳答案

• Just as a book is often judged ______ by the quality and appearance of its cover, a person is judged immediately by his appearance.

  A．previously B．uniquely C．outwardly D．initially

  查看最佳答案

• 英语翻译 友情在我过去的生活里就象一盏明灯,照彻了我的灵魂,使我的生存有了一点点光彩.——巴金. 这是有道翻译Friendship in my past life is just like a beacon,shining into my soul,make my survival had a little bit of brilliance.- ba jin. 这是谷歌翻译Friendship in my past life as a light,shine through my soul,that I had to survive a little glory.- Ba Jin.

  查看最佳答案

• We just can't judge a writer by his _____ （收入).

  A．discount B．account C．receipt D．income

  查看最佳答案

• The quality of a batch of drug substances is judged according to

  A．product appearance B．the inspection report C．product melting point D．product color

  查看最佳答案

• The ideal lawyer never forgets that he is an officer of the court, and that he as well as the judge____ responsible for the just outcome of every trial（）

  A．are B．was C．is D．be

  查看最佳答案

• You just need a lot of ______ instead of more ______.

  A．practices; grammars B．practice; grammar C．practices; grammar D．practice; grammars

  查看最佳答案